Chilling effects

Google whining about chilling effects of, e.g., EU privacy laws, makes no sense while their own YouTube Community Guidelines are a major part of the problem.  For 1/10 sec "male body part" in a historic (2008) 44 sec bonus scene of the 9to5 documentary I'm willing to find a compromise such as "blur" or even skip some frames.

OTOH 4 sec "woman douching" in a historic (2010) 214 sec interview by Clara Cullen are definitely not sexually gratifying, NSFW, or whatever.  Folks searching for four-letter words in video titles on YouTube—for the purpose of reporting this, anybody really interested in Pron would try PronHub—might be another part of the problem, but just accepting obviously bogus reports doesn't help to solve it.

Transparency report 2018	Transparency report 2019 (so far)
	…uploaded on March, 14 (PT)